Are BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India & China) economic growth hitting the wall?

Are BRIC nations hitting a growth wall?

The Edge by Mark Mobius Thursday, 18 October 2012

A GLOBAL pattern of easing economic growth in 1H2012 has impacted the “BRIC” nations of Brazil, Russia, India and China. However, I don’t think the economies have hit a brick wall.

While some market participants have been waiting impatiently for governments to undertake further stimulus measures, others have wondered whether something more fundamental — and less within governmental control — might be at work.

One theory in play is the concept of a “middle-income trap”. The premise is that emerging countries can find it hard to sustain high per-capita growth rates beyond a certain point since benefits from technology, low labour costs and easy productivity gains run out before the accumulation of technological capital permits a transition to a higher-wage, higher-productivity economic model.

Our team is not convinced that this argument holds water for the BRIC economies — or emerging markets as a whole.

China We think some deceleration of China’s growth rate was almost inevitable, given that the size of the country’s workforce seems to be peaking and the transfer from agricultural to industrial labour has slowed. In this context, forecasts of around 7% annual growth this year (as opposed to the near-10% average annual gains seen in recent years) seem entirely rational to us.

In his “Government Work Report” delivered to the National People’s Congress in March, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao projected a 7.5% growth rate for 2012, which we think could prove to be conservative.

Government policy has been shifting from state-directed, export-led and labour-intensive growth more toward an economic model emphasising internal consumption, technological strength and entrepreneurial expertise. Both supply and demand might be driving this transition: A substantial investment in higher education has expanded the pool of educated labour, and demand is growing from the ongoing, rapid rise in the size and wealth of China’s middle class.

Consumer indebtedness, including mortgage debt, is low in China, and outside of high-end housing in major cities, we don’t see a housing glut to pressure prices. Given these circumstances, we think China should be able to join South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Japan in escaping the “middle income trap”.

China’s leadership will be changing soon, and it will be interesting to see how its new leaders carry forward these structural changes and seek to maintain China’s status as a global growth leader.

India In contrast to China, India’s troubled government has been struggling to implement necessary investment and infrastructure projects, and a number of populist and anti-business initiatives have eroded investor confidence in recent months.

There was also concern that measures to support consumption were crowding out private sector investment and leading to balance-of-payment deficits. This summer, several international rating agencies had threatened to downgrade Indian sovereign debt to near-junk status. But suddenly, Indian leaders delivered some good news.

In mid-September, the government announced sweeping reforms, including plans to divest its stake in five companies, a shift away from subsidies, and the opening of foreign direct investment in power exchanges, the non-news broadcast media, retailing and aviation industries.

India’s central bank followed up by cutting the cash reserve ratio to 4.5% from 4.75%. While more reforms could be made, I think the guy actions of the Indian government and central bank represent positive steps towards restoring investor confidence, and could potentially set the stage for better growth going forward.

Despite the obstacles, India’s economy has proved adept at generating growth in recent years without heavy investment and with a much better ratio of growth to capital spending than China.

Unlike in China, India’s working population is generally expected to experience strong growth over the next decade, and labour reserves among the rural population are large. The impediments to continued growth should be surmountable, provided the political will is there, which leads us to believe in the economy’s growth potential.

Russia Russia, like China, may see its working-age population decline. However, we think Russia’s middle class could also swell as wealth from commodity exports filter through the economy. Businesses supplying consumer goods and services to this burgeoning market appear to have the potential to benefit.

Russia’s financial structures are underdeveloped, its consumer debt levels are generally low and recent GDP growth has been strong. A heavy dependence on the oil and gas industry could represent a risk factor, as oil accounts for the bulk of Russia’s exports and a considerable portion of federal budget revenues.

However, we feel that an oil price crash is unlikely, at least in the near or medium-term. In addition, the government recently announced ambitious economic reforms aimed at addressing the country’s dependence on commodity exports. Russia’s entry into the World Trade Organisation could provide a similar growth catalyst as it did for China after 2001.

Brazil Of the four BRIC economies, we believe Brazil perhaps gives investors most cause for concern. Its GDP growth in recent years has been below that of India and China, and a populist and interventionist tradition in government has left the country with unusually high taxes, a relatively high minimum wage compared with its peers, and potentially troublesome pension and benefit entitlements for public sector workers.

The country may also be more vulnerable than the other BRICs to fluctuations in the prices and demand for commodities, an area that financed its recent growth. However, we don’t see short-term commodity pullbacks leading to long-term weakness, as growth in several other emerging economies appears likely to continue to support demand.

Moreover, the government has been moving to address some of its challenges, notably with measures to curb pension costs for state employees, and there are signs of a renewed appetite for privatisation. Meanwhile, we believe domestic consumption could advance, supported by a young and dynamic working population, powering a gradual diversification of the economy.

Beyond BRIC The BRICs are by no means the totality of emerging markets. Other economies such as Columbia, Indonesia, Vietnam, Egypt, Turkey and South Africa as well as others in Africa could help offset a growth shortfall that might emerge in emerging markets as a whole as the BRICs mature. And, by supplying resources and new markets, they could also help reduce the impact of slowing growth and demand in developed countries on the more established emerging economies.

For these reasons, we believe that the BRIC nations aren’t hitting a growth brick wall. However, if emerging markets in general continue to achieve strong economic growth in the coming years, the BRIC countries will have to scale a few obstacles.

Posted by:

In Tune specialises in finance and accounting outsourcing, human resource (HR) outsourcing to SME business owners in Malaysia;that traditionally cannot afford professional services which they now can at a fraction of the cost less the headache; so that they have more time to focus on the business operations that matters to them.

Why hire an executive when you can now get at least one qualified professional with an executive at less than an executive pay?

Tags: , , , ,

No comments yet.

Leave your comment